Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4312 14
Original file (NR4312 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
mee err eS ee VN
t = '

wre et were PEEL Immnr i

Ac aM
BOAR PD FOP & NPPECTION OF NAVAL RPEFCORIS
7G S&S. COURTHOUSE HOA oe ve

ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

 

NR4312-14

= _ (aed Aros

Oo
>On

@

@M

Gt

2

0

 

Dear Sergeant yy

This is in reference to your a
naval record pursuant to the p
United States Code, section 15

A three-member panel of the Boar
sitting im emecutiv

' e
ation on 18 December 2014.

 
 
 
  

fy
sid oO

Mg Ut a
c O
0 R
QO.

wa

considered your
allegations of error and

     

a e were reviewed in accor with administrative
regulations and procedures appl the proceedings
Board. Documentary material cor Boarc

of your on, together v S

suppo your naval recore =

regul policies, du a ra

advis from Headquart dated 10
Septe copy of which

ion of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
request.

h

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such

that favorable action cannot be taken. ¥ enti

the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of n
©

u ew
evidence within one year from the date of the Board’s decision
evidence within
New evidence is
prior to making
is important to
attaches to all

one year from the date of the Board’s decision.
evidence not previously considered by the Board
its decision in this case. In this regard, it
keep in mind that a presumption of regularity
official records. Consequently, when applying

for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on
the applicant to Gemonstrate the existence Of pavubable material
error or injustice,

Enclosure

Sincerely,

ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6441 14

    Original file (NR6441 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your application claims, “I was eligible to transfer to the Flee. Reserve Pemruary oe 2011. iL was stationed at the Navy Personnel Command (NPC) at the time the Post 9/11 GI (Bjiii was enacted and consulted several individuals prior to electing to transfer to the Fleet Reserve.” Petitioner further claims that “one of those individuals was a person responsible for the approval to transfer eligibility for all Navy members at NPC. This letter states that I had an active duty date obligation...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10582 14

    Original file (NR10582 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings St this Board. It is regretted that the circumstances of your ca that favorable action cannot be taken. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9787 14

    Original file (NR9787 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Further, the Board particularly noted that you ing senior have provided nothing showing that either the reporti or the reviewing officer has acknowledged that the two-tiered evaluation system, to which you and the statement dated 1 May — a he all ee 2014 from Captain i -, USMC refer, was applied in preparing your fitness report. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board - prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR199 14

    Original file (NR199 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    & three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR1349-13

    Original file (NR1349-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 September 2013. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo 1160 Ser 811/111 dated 19 April 2013, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR12921 14

    Original file (NR12921 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    FO. Finally, the medical documentation you provided does not negate the diagnoses of your depressive disorder, history of drug abuse, or ADHD. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02085-08

    Original file (02085-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Boar of your application, support thereof, your naval record and applicable s regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of th record, the Board found that the evidence submitted insufficient to establish the existence of probable error or injustice. On 26 January 1991, the Department of Affairs denied your request for service connection of an alleged mortar wound of the right leg/foot be together with all material...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5361 14_Redacted

    Original file (NR5361 14_Redacted.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 8 October 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, any material submitted in support of your application, and prior case Eile. After careful and conscientious consideration of the enti record, the Board determined the letter from the Depart Veterans Affairs stating you are being treated for s...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR764 14_Redacted

    Original file (NR764 14_Redacted.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Although your application was not filed in a time Board found it in the interest of justice to wai limitations and consider your application on its three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 January 2015. After consulting with legal counsel, you lected to present your case to an administrative discharge board — (0 94...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11612 14_Redacted

    Original file (NR11612 14_Redacted.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by of your application, together with all : in support thereof, your naval record, and regulations, and policies record r personality n immaturi heroin, cocaine, amphetamine uana, a diethylamide (LSD). Further, the Board concluded that you received the benefit of your bargain with the Navy when your request for discharge was granted and you should not be permitted to charige it now. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record,...